Thread Index :: FAQ's :: Main Menu :: Posting Hints :: Emoticon Key :: Search
David's Lawspage :: EBU :: ACBL :: WBF
bridgetalk.com forums :: Laws & Rulings :: Nightmare

International Bridge Laws Forum

If you need help with the Laws or rulings from
any country in the world, this is the place!

Hosted by David Stevenson
Senior Consultant Director
English Bridge Union

To ask a question, click HERE and type in your message.
Please specify your country in your query where indicated.
Right click your mouse button for help on abbreviations.

Welcome, Register :: Log in 

View Thread Page(s): [ 1 ]

[ Get Email Advice of Replies ][ Print ][ Send ] [ Watch ] [ < ] [ Add a Reply ] [ > ]

Liu

Reply
Nightmare ( 08:33:25 SunAug 10 2003 )

Country: Singapore

* *


North: S: 98xx H: - D: xxxx C: 9xxxx

East: S: QJ10x H: Qxxx D: Kx C:Axx

South: S: K7xx H: AKx D: xxx C: KJx

West: S: A H: J10xxx D:AQxx C:Q10

North passed and East opened 1C (West later claimed he announced 'may be short' - South wasn't paying attention and North claimed he didn't hear that). South overcalled 1NT and West doubled. North asked about 1C, upon hearing that it might be short, bid 2C. East passed and South agonized. South reasoned that the question indicated that North had clubs and thus decided to 'go the other way' and treat 2C as STAYMAN (they partnered each other once before only, and agreed 'System On' for 1NT overcall) so he answered 2S. Two passes and East doubled, after that all passed.
N E S W
P 1C 1NT X
2C P 2S P
P X All passed.

West led the queen of clubs, not a great success. South played well and managed only two down (ace of clubs by East, club continued. South won and discard 2 diamonds on his AK hearts. heart ruff in dummy and low club to jack. West ruffed with ace and played 3 rounds of diamonds. Dummy ruff high and East overuffed. Heart return ruffed by South and diamond ruff high and overuffed. South must made two more tricks with K7x trumps.) East-West cried foul and asked for a ruling. East-West contended that North Question made certain that South would answer Stayman and that South pass of 2C should be LA.
South countered that he's in a no-win situation no matter how he bid as North's question could be interpret both ways. I was the director and to get the game going I ruled that the table result stand as it was due largely to a unfortunate lead and South's fine play that East-West missed their heavy penalty. I of course informed the players their rights to appeal but in the end N-S's team won by a big enough margin to make this board a non-issue. Still, academically it will be interesting to know how should the ruling be.

  
Ed

172 posts
Forum Host

Reply
Re: Nightmare ( 18:04:11 FriAug 15 2003 )

I think your ruling was correct.

  
bluejak

426 posts
Forum Host

Reply
Re: Nightmare ( 13:35:19 TueAug 19 2003 )

Goodness, you do have some complaining pairs, Liu! :smile: South was as ethical as possible: if he had passed that would have got howls from East-West. Excellent ruling.



---
David Stevenson <laws2@blakjak.com>
Liverpool, England, UK
http://blakjak.com/lws_menu.htm
 
 

View Thread Page(s): [ 1 ]

[ Get Email Advice of Replies ][ Print ][ Send ] [ Watch ] [ < ] [ Add a Reply ] [ > ]

7 bridge player(s) online in the last 15 minutes - 1 bridgetalk member(s), 0 incognito and 6 guest(s).
(The most ever was 52 09:45:43 Fri Feb 14 2003)
bluejak

 Total Members: 393, Newest Member: edm.

Register :: Log in

The time is now 00:19:24 Wed Aug 27 2003

Powered By BbBoard V1.4.2
© 2001-2003 BbBoy.net
Thread Index :: FAQ's :: Main Menu :: Posting Hints :: Emoticon Key :: Search
David's Lawspage :: EBU :: ACBL :: WBF

Legend :: Read Topic :: Unread Topic

Email Help | Full Format: ON :: OFF | Text: ON :: OFF | Email Status